- Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches update#
- Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches Patch#
- Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches code#
- Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches series#
Keep using Git, and more concepts will occasionally drop out of the sky: refs, tags, the reflog, fast-forward commits, detached head state (!), remote branches, tracking, namespaces 5. Remember the complicated information model in step 1? It keeps growing, like a cancer.
Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches series#
Translation: git-rebase – Sequentially regenerate a series of commits so they can be applied directly to the head node 4. Git-rebase – Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head Here’s a description for humans: git-push – Upload changes from your local repository into a remote repository
Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches update#
Git-push – Update remote refs along with associated objects They describe the commands from the perspective of a computer scientist, not a user. The man pages are one almighty “fuck you”.
Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches Patch#
It combines email reading with patch applying, and thus uses a different patch syntax (specifically, one with email headers at the top). The most spectacular example of this is the command “git am”, which as far as I can tell, is something Linus hacked up and forced into the main codebase to solve a problem he was having one night. The various options of “git reset” do completely different things. Specifying filenames completely changes the semantics of some commands (“git commit” ignores local, unstaged changes in foo.txt “git commit foo.txt” doesn’t). But the shortcut for “git branch” combined with “git checkout”? “git checkout -b”. Some “shortcuts” are graced with top level commands: “git pull” is exactly equivalent to “git fetch” followed by “git merge”. The command line syntax is completely arbitrary and inconsistent.
Now Git: you have files, a working tree, an index, a local repository, a remote repository, remotes (pointers to remote repositories), commits, treeishes (pointers to commits), branches, a stash… and you need to know all of it. In fact, branches are tags, and files you already know about, so you really need to learn three new things. That’s pretty much everything you need to know. As a point of reference, consider Subversion: you have files, a working directory, a repository, versions, branches, and tags. The information model is complicated – and you need to know all of it. What a pity that it’s so hard to learn, has such an unpleasant command line interface, and treats its users with such utter contempt. It has a powerful distributed model which allows advanced users to do tricky things with branches, and rewriting history.
Mercurial tortoisehg see list of all active public branches code#
You will now work on the new branch by default.Git is the source code version control system that is rapidly becoming the standard for open source projects.
The new branch will be created and your changes committed to it.
Select the “Open a new named branch†option and give it a name. Pressing it will bring up a windows with several branch options: When you are ready to commit, look for the “Branch: ****†button on the top toolbar of the commit window: To manually create a new branch, simply make changes as normal on the existing repository. Fortunately, manually creating a branch is also straightforward in TortoiseHG (if not obvious). That is easy and straightforward in TortoiseHG, but today I wanted to create a branch using my existing repository. Normally, when I wanted to work on a branch, I would clone a repository and work on the branch from that clone. I have generally been very happy and have taken frequent advantage of its ability to clone and branch cheaply. I have settled on Mercurial (through TortoiseHG) for my source control needs. Any project, no matter how small, can be improved by the use of source control.
0 kommentar(er)
